>
Tag Archives: women

Where Are All the Minority Directors at the Oscars?

14 Jan

by s.e. smith

This week has marked excitement in Hollywood as everyone got ready for the release of the official list of nominations and subsequent dissection of the Oscar nods; everyone wanted to know who was in, who was out and who got snubbed. It was a tough Oscar field to choose from this year, with a large number of excellent films on deck for consideration, and inevitably, some lost out while others, like Lincoln, became leaders of the pack. Members of the Academy didn’t have an easy job when it came to deciding which films to include in the contention for one of the most prestigious awards in film.

One thing stood out this year, as it does every year: the significant lack of recognition for minority directors.

Ang Lee was the only nonwhite director nominated in the Best Director category, and no women at all were on the list; notably, Kathryn Bigelow, who would have been eligible with Zero Dark Thirty, was the first woman to win an Oscar in this category, in 2008. It took the Academy 80 years to recognize a woman’s contributions to the field and it’s apparently reluctant to do so again. Ang Lee’s been nominated — and honored — before, in 2005, with Brokeback Mountain, making him the first nonwhite recipient of the Best Director Oscar, and we’ll see if he takes it again with Life of Pi.

Women were moderately better represented among the producers on the Best Picture nominees: Kathleen Kennedy, Pilar Savone, Donna Gigliotti, Stacey Sher, Debra Hayward, Megan Ellison and Kathryn Bigelow showed up here for their contributions on films like Silver Linings Playbook and Zero Dark Thirty. But the list was heavily dominated, overall, by men, and not just men, but white men. Is Hollywood really teeming with white male directors and producers, to the point that almost no nonwhite producers and filmmakers can be found, let alone women? Or is there some bias in the Academy’s selection process? It’s actually a bit of a mixture of both, which highlights the way sexism operates in society.

Getting ahead in Hollywood is substantially easier if you’re a white man; more doors tend to open to you, and more opportunities are created for you. Many white males in the Hollywood establishment benefit directly from racism and sexism and aren’t aware of it, though some certainly take note and a smaller number even try to fight it. Because of the slimmer chances of developing a career if you’re a member of a minority group, it means the Academy has fewer projects written, directed and produced by minorities to choose from, and unconscious biases also affect nomination decisions, confounding with the lack of projects to choose from to create suspiciously white and male lists.

To change the racial and gender makeup of nomination lists, the Academy would need to go out of its way to identify eligible projects by minorities and incorporate them into the consideration process. In any confrontation of gender and race inequality, conversations about “reverse racism” tend to come up when people talk about promoting people from minority backgrounds, as though people are suggesting that people with inferior experience and qualifications should be chosen over white men for the “diversity quotient.” (Quotas are another thing that tend to get bandied about.) Proposals to level the playing field, though, aren’t about choosing minorities over members of the majority — they’re about giving minorities an equal shot in a system with odds stacked against them.

Minority projects tend to be underpromoted, underfunded and underrecognized. It’s time to change that. It shouldn’t be remarkable to see nonwhite people and people of color among the Oscar nods, any more than it should be to see women. In 2013, we should be long past this.

3 Brave Women Who Risk Their Lives for Justice

18 Dec

Despite death threats, exile and violence, activists remain undeterred.
December 14, 2012 | AlterNet / By Sarah Seltzer

The three honorees speak at the AJWS luncheon.

The three honorees speak at the AJWS luncheon. Photo Credit: AJWS

Activists challenging the status quo here in the United States frequently put their bodies on the line by risking arrest or police brutality. But around the world, the simple act of speaking up for basic human rights, whether it’s pushing for an end to genocide, fighting impunity for crimes, or supporting the dignity and rights of women, all types of nonviolent resistance can risk death threats, torture, violence, harassment and exile.

Last Monday, Human Rights Day, New Yorkers at a benefit luncheon for the American Jewish World Service , a human rights organization headed by Ruth Messinger, met three women who are organizing for rights around the world, women who walk daily in harm’s way and have seen unimaginable atrocities, but are undeterred in their struggle.

Before the panel, I was lucky to meet the three honorees. I spoke to Khin Omar from Burma, Cecelia T.M. Danuweli from Liberia and Claudia Samayoa of Guatemala about the moments that spurred them to take that initial risk and speak out for dignity and equality in their homelands. Later, they engaged on these same questions in a panel moderated by Mara Liasson from NPR before a lively audience of 250, mostly women and donors, who left feeling humbled, inspired and rededicated to their own activism.

Fighting for justice in Burma
Khin Omar realized her life would never be the same when, as a young woman, she survived a repressive crackdown on student demonstrators in Burma in 1988, witnessing beatings and violence from the riot police and narrowly escaping. “I got home that night, my body shaking,” she said, and from that moment on, she “became a different person.”

She said that for her, human rights activism wasn’t really about abstract ideals of democracy and civil rights, but about what she had witnessed: “injustice without rationale.”

“I wanted to do something,” she said. She spent months as an organizer playing “cat and mouse” games with the authorities, she told me, and eventually there was no safe place left. She had to flee. When she left to join the resistance in the rural area near the Thailand border, she learned about the country’s civil war and the use of rape as a weapon of war. “This struggle is not only in the city,” she said.

She was granted political refugee status in the US and has spent the ensuing years traveling, getting educated, spreading awareness, and becoming committed to feminism and gender justice in addition to peace and civil rights for Burma’s ethnic population through her work with the Burma Partnership .

Omar has been fighting for her country for over two decades. “You come to ‘I can’t do it’ moments. But those of us who stand up once can never be suppressed anymore,” she told me. “We’re not alone–as women in particular. If there is a success in one place, it is a success for all of us.”

Omar worries that with the release of Aung San Suu Kyi from house arrest and her election to Parliament, and the recent visit from President Obama and Secretary of State Clinton, the West thinks the conflict is over–and US companies will rush in to exploit new markets and resources “in an area where conflict is taking place.”

“[Suu Kyi] is trying hard, but Burma remains engaged in a civil war. Ethnic women are still raped and killed. Political prisoners still exist,” she said.

Standing up for peace in Liberia
Cecilia T.M. Danuweli has worked side by side with Nobel Prize winner Leymah Gbowee to bring a cessation of violence to Liberia, which is scarred by a long civil war and the brutal rule of Charles Taylor. ”Hell broke loose in our country,” Danuweli said. The women of Gbowee’s peacemakers group were known for their public mobilizations, “sitting there in the rain and sun as silent witnesses for peace” Danuweli told attendees at the ceremony.

Danuweli has advocated against violence against women, keeping vigil outside the courthouse where perpetrators were being tried as well as beginning an “intergender dialogue to end violence” with separate sessions for men. Although some of the stories she has to tell are gruesome and disturbing, including every kind of brutal killing imaginable, she told me that telling them brings “healing, relief, self-esteem.”

Her own story is particularly painful. Journalist Debra Nussbaum Cohen, who was at the luncheon, relates it:

Danuweli told her a story that she repeated for the benefit of the luncheon audience. As part of Liberia’s reconciliation efforts, she met with a man who began telling her about the man he had murdered and then cut up along every joint in his body. It was Danuweli’s stepfather. His disjointed body parts were given to her sister in a plastic bag to take home for burial. When she recognized that it was her own family’s story and began crying, the murderer said, I don’t care, and just walked away, she related. “He thought he was talking to somebody else, not the victim. People should hear what is happening in Africa. We live with the pains” of the bloodshed, Danuweli said.

Liberia’s president, Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf, represents progress, but Danuweli, who works with the West Africa Network for Peacebuilding, believes that with all-male power structures still in place, Liberia remains in danger of backsliding into conflict.

“Don’t think because a country signed a peace accord things are okay,” she told me. Without strong efforts at repatriation and changed norms, “patterns start repeating.”

Protecting human rights in war-torn Guatemala
Claudia Samayoa was in the United States just weeks after receiving threats against her life—which was nothing new to her. Her work with Guatemala’s Human Rights Defender’s Protection Unit aims to protect peacemakers, human right workers and civilians from the threat posed by oligarchs, an army and warlords in a region recovering from a decades-long civil war, genocide against the indigenous people and an epidemic of femicide. In some regions, women who speak out on politics are accused of having a “pact with the devil” Samayoa told the audience, saying “The price of war is paid on our bodies.”

Her work has put her under serious threat of bodily harm before. Her car has been tampered with and she has had to flee. Samayoa told me that her activism has always arisen from a feeling that what she was doing was “never enough.” With every campaign, she asks herself “to invent what has not been invented. What else can be done?”

When she receives a threat, she remembers that her efforts are working. “What they want is conflict,” she says. “Every time we get attacked it’s because something is changing.” And the double impact of gender discrimination persists. In every class, ideology and sector, Samayoa told the audience, sexism and harassment are prevalent. “We need a culture change,” she said.

At home, whether we’re occupying Wall Street, campaigning for an end to domestic violence, or fighting for immigrant rights, we have so much to learn from activists around the world who have put their safety on the line for a better future for their families.

And it’s no coincidence that they’re all women.
“Women have a role to not only promote human rights and women’s rights,” Khin Omar told me, “but to bridge gaps. There are different experiences, but when we come together we have strength.”

    Sarah Seltzer is an associate editor at AlterNet and a freelance writer based in New York City. Her work has been published at the Nation, the Christian Science Monitor, Jezebel and the Washington Post. Follow her on Twitter at @sarahmseltzer and find her work at sarahmseltzer.com.

Indentured Labor Hidden in America’s Richest Homes

5 Dec

by Piper Hoffman

A modern day form of slavery is imprisoning poor people for their labor, and it’s happening in some of the swankiest kitchens in our country. Live-in domestic workers cook, clean and care for children. Some of them work from dawn ’til dusk, or longer. Many don’t get sick days, vacation time, or holidays. Some are paid a pittance, far less than the minimum wage. Some of them aren’t allowed out of the house.

Nearly all of it is legal. “The Fair Labor Standards Act, which guarantees minimum wage, overtime and sick and vacation pay, does not apply to domestic workers,” CNN reports.

A new study about the lives of domestic workers documents the exploitative conditions many of them work in. The University of Chicago teamed up with non-profit groups to identify and interview subjects for “Home Economics: The Invisible and Unregulated World of Domestic Work.” Among the study’s findings about domestic workers:

  • 67% of live-in workers are paid below the state minimum wage.
  • 48% receive an hourly wage that is too low to adequately support a family.
  • 96% are not covered by employer-provided insurance.
  • More than 91% of workers’ employers do not pay into Social Security for them.
  • 20% experienced “times in the previous month when there was no food to eat in their [own] homes because there was no money to buy any.”
  • 82% had no paid sick days.

CNN described the conditions for one worker documented in the study:

Anna worked seven days a week as a nanny for the family of a Fortune 500 company executive. She lived with them in their 5th Avenue apartment in Midtown Manhattan. Her day began at 6 when the children woke up and didn’t end until 10 at night when she put them to bed and cleaned the kitchen. She cooked meals, did laundry and tended to the children’s needs. She slept on the floor in between their beds. She did not have a single day off in 15 months.

Anna earned $1.27 an hour.

Domestic labor is considered women’s work, and is devalued accordingly. Two other factors depress these workers’ wages: one is that they are disproportionately minorities, and the other is that many of them are undocumented immigrants.

The exploitation and injustice domestic workers face are just the kind of wrongs that laws like the Fair Labor Standards Act were meant to end. But the FLSA does not apply to people who work in others’ homes. Based on the University of Chicago study, The New York Times called for this to change. Domestic workers’ “experiences argue for strong policy reforms, starting with including domestic labor in the list of occupations that enjoy core federal and state workplace protections. These women deserve fair treatment. Achieving basic rights shouldn’t have to depend, haphazardly, on the kindness of their employers.”

Efforts to protect these workers’ basic human rights under the law have often failed. California’s governor vetoed a Domestic Workers’ Bill of Rights in October. On the other hand, in 2010 New York enacted a Domestic Workers Bill of Rights that applied “all of the major labor laws protecting other workers” to the vulnerable individuals working in people’s homes, including ”overtime pay at time and a half [the] regular rate of pay, a minimum of one day of rest per week, protection from discrimination and harassment and inclusion of part-time workers in disability laws.”

Domestic workers are, for those who can afford to hire them, a replacement for the old-fashioned ideal wife. She cooks, cleans, raises the children, and accepts whatever pin money her husband chooses to bestow. Her life revolves around his needs while hers are neglected — or, as Betty Friedan argued, sublimated, redirected, or otherwise turned monstrous. Treating women like machines just doesn’t work, puerile science fiction stories to the contrary notwithstanding.

The plight of suburban housewives has had many champions for many years and giant strides have been made. Now it is the domestic workers’ turn.

The University of Chicago study makes many recommendations. Here are just a few of them:

  • rights to the minimum wage, overtime pay, breaks, and rest days
  • health coverage for full-time employees
  • rights to employer contributions to Social Security, unemployment insurance, and workers’ compensation
  • protection from discrimination and harassment

In other words, the law should extend to domestic workers the same rights it grants to other employees. Equality — isn’t that what housewives wanted too?

2010 Presidential Citizen’s Award

9 Aug